FROM PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITIONS TO MODERN ERA
CBT TREATING ANXIETY
Introduction
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) represents a common evidence-based therapy for treating anxiety disorders. CBT draws its roots from three philosophical schools that include Stoicism and rational empiricism, and pragmatism to demonstrate how conscious thinking influences emotional responses and behavioral actions. Epicurus (341–270 BCE) declared that disturbances stem from our thoughts about things rather than the things themselves (Inwood & Gerson, 1997). According to Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius, Stoic philosophers demonstrated that human suffering originates from our interpretations and judgments of events rather than from the events themselves (Long, 2002). If a Stoic philosopher was to treat anxiety in ancient times, he would instruct his patients to distinguish their control boundaries from uncontrolled aspects and to assess thoughts rationally while accepting natural events as part of fate. The person would understand how to detect and transform harmful mental processes through their daily activities of reflection and meditation. The ancient philosophical ideas about mental wellness match exactly with the current CBT principles, which focus on structured mental reconstruction to treat anxiety. This article examines CBT’s philosophical origins alongside its effectiveness in treating anxiety while discussing cultural assessments and effective strategies for implementing CBT across various population groups.
Effectiveness and Adaptability Rooted from Philosophy
The core principle of CBT states that incorrect thinking patterns produce emotional suffering, which leads to undesirable actions. The therapeutic approach relies on empirical methods based on rational principles to help clients change their thinking and behavioral patterns (Beck, 2011). CBT’s philosophical foundation rests on three core principles, which make it easily accessible to clients by focusing on conscious thinking and rational problem-solving. Stoicism shares the same pragmatic focus, which examines internal rational processes rather than external factors (Leahy, 2017).
The majority of researchers consider CBT to be one of the most successful treatments for anxiety disorders. The identification and restructuring of incorrect or negative thoughts through CBT leads to reduced anxiety symptoms and enhanced client functioning (Hofmann, Asnaani, Vonk, Sawyer, & Fang, 2012). CBT treatment consists of 8–16 sessions, which enables clients to obtain practical skills they can apply after therapy ends to build their resilience. Cuijpers et al. (2016), together with Hofmann et al. (2012) show that CBT achieves moderate to large effect sizes through studies indicating anxiety disorder remission rates between 60% and 80%.
The broad acceptance of CBT has not stopped researchers from pointing out its Western foundations, which include self-concept and individualistic approaches and logical thinking (Hays, 2009). CBT faces criticism from critics who claim it does not properly consider different cultural approaches to thinking and emotional communication. Research demonstrates that the cultural integration of clients’ belief systems and values makes CBT an effective treatment. The effectiveness of CBT increases when treatment professionals incorporate both cultural values and beliefs of their patients. The treatment approach should derive from the belief systems and cultural context of the client. (Şar, 2013). According to Öztürk and Toprak (2017), CBT treatment effectiveness improves when therapists apply fundamental principles while adapting their approach to match clients’ cultural backgrounds. The CBT method does not exist with ineffective cultural applications because clinicians achieve better results through learning client values and beliefs before modifying CBT to match their cultural setting. When clinicians recognize cultural obstacles in CBT effectiveness, they should begin by comprehending the client’s belief system before using relevant cultural metaphors alongside other treatment approaches or community resources. Flexibility in therapy delivery leads to better patient engagement while producing more effective results.
The numerous interconnected elements explain why CBT achieves better results than other treatments in most clinical environments. The clinical evidence supporting CBT surpasses any other therapeutic approach since researchers have conducted more randomized controlled trials (Hofmann et al., 2012). CBT requires only 8–16 sessions for delivery, thus making it both accessible and cost-effective. The therapeutic approach uses logical thinking to solve problems, just like regular problem-solving, because it helps clients understand the process better. CBT provides clients with practical skills that they can apply after finishing treatment so they can develop self-reliance and sustain their mental well-being. The philosophical basis of CBT demonstrates its alignment with pragmatic and rational empiricism through these benefits. The observable and testable strategies of CBT replace abstract unconscious processes by providing practical tools to clients. The universal accessibility and modern evidence-based practice standards, and multicultural compatibility of this approach stem from its design. The principles of Stoicism apply directly to the practice of CBT. A Stoic philosopher would tell patients that their judgments about external events create their distress rather than the events themselves. The treatment plan would direct the person to establish what aspects of their life they control versus what aspects they do not control and devote their efforts to the controllable aspects. The therapeutic approach would promote both a logical assessment of distressing ideas and acceptance of destiny and natural laws. Regular practice of self-reflection and meditation allows people to identify negative thought patterns, which they can then modify. The cognitive restructuring methods in CBT demonstrate a continuous thread of thought that spans across thousands of years since they match the approach of CBT.
The effectiveness and adaptability of CBT stem from its philosophical base in Stoicism combined with pragmatism and rational empiricism. The combination of strong empirical evidence and client-oriented methods has established CBT as a preferred therapeutic approach for treating anxiety in different population groups. The core principles of CBT demonstrate enough flexibility to work within diverse cultural settings when therapists practice respectful understanding of client beliefs and values. The combination of ancient philosophical knowledge with contemporary clinical methods maintains CBT as a strong and useful therapeutic system.
References
Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Cuijpers, P., Karyotaki, E., Reijnders, M., & Purgato, M. (2016). Meta-analyses and mega-analyses of the
effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: A systematic review. Psychological Medicine,
46(10), 2163–2176.
Hays, P. A. (2009). Integrating evidence-based practice, cognitive-behavior therapy, and multicultural therapy.
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(4), 354–360.
Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral
therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 427–440.
Inwood, B., & Gerson, L. P. (1997). The Epicurus reader: Selected writings and testimonia. Hackett Publishing.
Leahy, R. L. (2017). Cognitive therapy techniques: A practitioner’s guide. Guilford Press.
Long, A. A. (2002). Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic guide to life. Oxford University Press.
Öztürk, M., & Toprak, İ. (2017). Kültürel adaptasyon ve bilişsel davranışçı terapinin etkinliği. Anatolian Journal of
Psychiatry, 18(1), 12–23.
Şar, V. (2013). Kültürel bağlamda psikoterapi ve tedavi süreçleri. Journal of Psychotherapy Studies, 6(2), 101–114.
